Question 4 — Policy brief (10 marks; ~300 words) Draft a concise policy brief (max 300 words) advising a national regulator on how to reduce online distribution of non-consensual or pirated adult videos while protecting privacy and due process. Include one legislative change, one technical requirement for platforms, and one public-awareness initiative.
Question 3 — Ethical and social impact [10 marks; ~300 words] Discuss harms associated with illicit adult-content distribution (consent, exploitation, minors, doxxing, malware). Propose three mitigation measures that balance freedom of expression and harm reduction; evaluate trade-offs.
Marking rubric (10): harm analysis (4), mitigation proposals (4), trade-off evaluation (2).
Marking rubric (10): feasibility (4), balance of privacy/due process (3), clarity and concision (3).
Marking rubric (10): chain-of-custody & preservation (4), cloud/CDN specifics (3), log/artifact priorities (3).
Question 2 — Technical forensic case study [10 marks; ~300 words] You are given a seizure warrant for a server associated with uncut99 (hypothetical). Describe a forensics plan to preserve, image, and analyze the server and associated infrastructure without contaminating evidence. Include steps for cloud-hosted services, CDN caching, and relevant logs to collect.
Marking rubric (10): legal identifications (4), enforcement strategy clarity (4), jurisdictional nuance (2).
